Under 37 Code of Federal Regulations During a public comment period § 202.18, the Library may provide limite on-site access to groups of newspapers electronically submitte for registration, as well as electronic serials and books submitted for mandatory deposit. The Copyright Office has proposed expanding the categories of electronic deposits covere by the regulation with the same limitations on access as are currently in place. Specifically, the works may only be access under the supervision of Library staff . The through computer terminals in the Library’s reading rooms. These terminals are not connected to the Internet and the input/output connections (USB, etc.) are disabled. Libraries support expanding on-site access rules to new categories of deposits to ensure that over time, the public can continue to access works in the Library’s collection.
Rule, groups representing rightsholders surface
concerns about infringement, and urged the fresh mobile database Office to heighten security and protection of electronic deposit copies before instituting its proposed rule. As SPN observes in its reply comments. The there is no serious basis for these concerns, as the security measures in place already render electronic materials less accessible and less susceptible
To misuse than traditional print formats.
Rightsholder groups also suggest that licenses are challenges in deep data exploration necessary when the Copyright Office transfers deposits to the Library, and when the Library provides digital access to works. The Internet Archive notes that a licensing regime
is not necessary to permit access to the
Library’s collections, explaining that “the Copyright Act
has always allowed libraries to preserve and provide access to consumer data works in their collection without permission or authorization from rightsholders.” Indeed, “Congress has never required the Library of Congress, or any other library, to pay licensing During a public comment period fees to preserve or lend items in their collections.”